The importance of reporting the effect size in quantitative studies
Abstract
No Abstract No Abstract No Abstract No Abstract No Abstract
1. Hinchliffe LJ, Brown D. American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American psychological association (5th edition. Boston: McGraw hill; 2001.P:186.
2. Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of experimental psychology: General. 2012 Feb;141(1):2.
3. Wei R, Hu Y, Xiong J. Effect size reporting practices in applied linguistics research: A study of one major journal. Sage Open. 2019 May;9(2):1-11.
4. Ferguson, C. J. An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology. Research and Practice. 2009; 40(5): 532-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808
5. Osborne JW. Sweating the small stuff in educational psychology: how effect size and power reporting failed to change from 1969 to 1999, and what that means for the future of changing practices. Educational Psychology. 2008;28(2):151-60.
6. Field, A. P. Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock “n” roll) (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.2009.
7. Farahani, H, Rahiminejad HR, Ghomrani AA. Common statistical error in behavioral sciences (Persian). Seminary & University Journal of Methodology of Social Science.2008;14(55):85-94.
8. Lee DK. Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2016 Dec;69(6):555-62.
9. Akbari Zarradkhaneh S. Necessity of Measuring and Reporting Effect Size Measures in Psychological Studies. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ). 2016 Jun 10;5(1):29-46.
10. Pogrow S. How effect size (practical significance) misleads clinical practice: The case for switching to practical benefit to assess applied research findings. The American Statistician. 2019 Mar 29;73(sup1):223-34.
11. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. Journal of graduate medical education. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82.
12. Gignac GE, Szodorai ET. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and individual differences. 2016 Nov 1;102:74-8.
13. Fan X. Statistical significance and effect size in education research: Two sides of a coin. The Journal of Educational Research. 2001 May 1;94(5):275-82.
2. Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of experimental psychology: General. 2012 Feb;141(1):2.
3. Wei R, Hu Y, Xiong J. Effect size reporting practices in applied linguistics research: A study of one major journal. Sage Open. 2019 May;9(2):1-11.
4. Ferguson, C. J. An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology. Research and Practice. 2009; 40(5): 532-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808
5. Osborne JW. Sweating the small stuff in educational psychology: how effect size and power reporting failed to change from 1969 to 1999, and what that means for the future of changing practices. Educational Psychology. 2008;28(2):151-60.
6. Field, A. P. Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock “n” roll) (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.2009.
7. Farahani, H, Rahiminejad HR, Ghomrani AA. Common statistical error in behavioral sciences (Persian). Seminary & University Journal of Methodology of Social Science.2008;14(55):85-94.
8. Lee DK. Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2016 Dec;69(6):555-62.
9. Akbari Zarradkhaneh S. Necessity of Measuring and Reporting Effect Size Measures in Psychological Studies. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ). 2016 Jun 10;5(1):29-46.
10. Pogrow S. How effect size (practical significance) misleads clinical practice: The case for switching to practical benefit to assess applied research findings. The American Statistician. 2019 Mar 29;73(sup1):223-34.
11. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. Journal of graduate medical education. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82.
12. Gignac GE, Szodorai ET. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and individual differences. 2016 Nov 1;102:74-8.
13. Fan X. Statistical significance and effect size in education research: Two sides of a coin. The Journal of Educational Research. 2001 May 1;94(5):275-82.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 8 No 1 (2021): Winter | |
| Section | Editorial(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v8i1.4486 | |
| Keywords | ||
| effect size; quantitative studies | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
Nikpeyma N, Maroufizadeh S, Esmaeili M. The importance of reporting the effect size in quantitative studies. NPT. 2020;8(1):4-6.
