The achievement of Nursing Practice Today based on CiteScore metrics from the Scopus
Abstract
No Abstract
1. Gasparyan AY. Choosing the target journal: do authors need a comprehensive approach?. Journal of Korean medical science. 2013 Aug 1;28(8):1117-9.
2. Lariviere V, Sugimoto CR. The journal impact factor: A brief history, critique, and discussion of adverse effects. InSpringer handbook of science and technology indicators 2019 (pp. 3-24). Springer, Cham.
3. Teixeira da Silva JA, Memon AR. CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric?. Scientometrics. 2017 Apr;111(1):553-6.
4. Okagbue HI, Teixeira da Silva JA. Correlation between the CiteScore and Journal Impact Factor of top-ranked library and information science journals. Scientometrics. 2020 Jul;124(1):797-801.
5. Davis, P. Can Scopus Deliver A Better Journal Impact Metric? The Scholarly Kitchen. 2016. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/03/07/can-scopus-deliver-a-betterjournal-impact-metric/
6. Van Noorden R. Controversial impact factor gets a heavyweight rival. Nature News. 2016 Dec 15;540(7633):325.
7. Salisbury L. Scopus CiteScore and Clarivate Journal Citation Reports. The Charleston Advisor. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):5-15.
8. Teixeira da Silva JA. CiteScore: Advances, evolution, applications, and limitations. Publishing Research Quarterly. 2020 Sep;36(3):459-68.
2. Lariviere V, Sugimoto CR. The journal impact factor: A brief history, critique, and discussion of adverse effects. InSpringer handbook of science and technology indicators 2019 (pp. 3-24). Springer, Cham.
3. Teixeira da Silva JA, Memon AR. CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric?. Scientometrics. 2017 Apr;111(1):553-6.
4. Okagbue HI, Teixeira da Silva JA. Correlation between the CiteScore and Journal Impact Factor of top-ranked library and information science journals. Scientometrics. 2020 Jul;124(1):797-801.
5. Davis, P. Can Scopus Deliver A Better Journal Impact Metric? The Scholarly Kitchen. 2016. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/03/07/can-scopus-deliver-a-betterjournal-impact-metric/
6. Van Noorden R. Controversial impact factor gets a heavyweight rival. Nature News. 2016 Dec 15;540(7633):325.
7. Salisbury L. Scopus CiteScore and Clarivate Journal Citation Reports. The Charleston Advisor. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):5-15.
8. Teixeira da Silva JA. CiteScore: Advances, evolution, applications, and limitations. Publishing Research Quarterly. 2020 Sep;36(3):459-68.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 9 No 2 (2022): Spring | |
| Section | Editorial(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v9i2.8890 | |
| Keywords | ||
| CiteScore CiteScore Tracker journal metrics index Scopus | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
Beykmirza R, Negarandeh R. The achievement of Nursing Practice Today based on CiteScore metrics from the Scopus. NPT. 2022;9(2):79-80.
