Perspective Piece

Applying Carspecken's critical ethnography method to uncover the culture of health disparity in intensive care units

Abstract

Background & Aim: Carspecken’s critical ethnography method has gained prominence in nursing research, necessitating a fresh perspective on its practicality and advantages. This study aims to provide a unique viewpoint on using critical ethnography as a foundational methodology to uncover health disparity culture in intensive care units.
Methods & Materials: While emphasizing its review design with original examples, this perspective piece provides a practical explanation of Carspecken’s five-stage critical ethnography approach. Grounded in the ontological and epistemological paradigm, this essay examines critical ethnography as a crucial approach to illuminating the discursive culture surrounding health disparities. Also, this study presents original instances of monological and dialogical data, reconstructive analysis, and findings from a study that was carried out to provide more perspective on implementation. It also mentions how it relates the findings to social factors and sociopolitical theories.
Results: The study reveals nuanced insights into the practicality and advantages of Carspecken’s method, shedding light on social processes contributing to health disparities in intensive care units. This method allowed us to identify how external powers extend to the intensive care unit, revealing a concealed culture that disrupts service provision balance. It exposed individual, organizational, and systemic roots contributing to disparities. Additionally, it highlighted how individual diversities can lead to disparity.
Conclusion: This study highlights the significance of Carspecken’s critical ethnography in nursing studies within the critical theory tradition. It is argued that Carspecken’s approach to critical ethnography is particularly instrumental in elucidating the social structures contributing to health disparities.

Smyth W, Holmes C: Using Carspecken's critical ethnography in nursing research. Contemporary Nurse 2005, 19(1-2):65-74. doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_185_19
2. Mitchell GJ, Cody WK: The role of theory in qualitative research. Nursing Science Quarterly 1993, 6(4):170-178. doi: 10.1177/089431849300600405
3. Briggs ARJ, Coleman M, Morrison M: Research Methods in Educational Leadership and Management: SAGE Publications; 2012.
4. Leininger MM: Leininger's theory of nursing: Cultural care diversity and universality. Nursing science quarterly 1988, 1(4):152-160. doi: 10.1177/089431848800100408
5. Leininger M: Theoretical questions and concerns: Response from the theory of culture care diversity and universality perspective. Nursing Science Quarterly 2007, 20(1):9-13. doi: 10.1177/08943184062967
6. Taylor B, Francis K: Ethnography. In: Qualitative Research in the Health Sciences. edn.: Routledge; 2013: 80-90.
7. Pimienta J, St-Amant O, Guruge S, Hart C, Catallo C: Examining newcomer women's experiences with perinatal care in Ontario, Canada: An application of Carspecken's critical ethnographic method. The Qualitative Report 2022, 27(3):716-730. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.4882
8. Gastaldo D: Epistemological congruence and rigour in qualitative research [video]. Toronto: Centre for Critical Qualitative Health Research, University of Toronto 2018.
9. Carspecken PF, Gitlin AD: Critical Ethnography in Educational Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide: Routledge; 1996.
10. Kincheloe JL, McLaren P, Steinberg SR, Monzó L: Critical pedagogy and qualitative research. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research 2018, 5:235-260.
11. Foley D, Valenzuela A: Critical ethnography. The Sage handbook of qualitative research 2005:217-234.
12. Habermas J: Knowledge and human interests: Transl. By jeremy j. Shapiro: Beacon Press; 1972.
13. Cook KE: Using critical ethnography to explore issues in health promotion. Qualitative Health Research 2005, 15(1):129-138. doi: 10.1177/1049732304267751
14. Lee H, Kim D, Lee S, Fawcett J: The concepts of health inequality, disparities and equity in the era of population health. Applied Nursing Research 2020, 56:151367. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151367
15. Spradley JP: Participant observation: Waveland Press; 2016.
16. Oun MA, Bach C: Qualitative research method summary. Qualitative Research 2014, 1(5):252-258. URL: http://www.jmest.org/wp-content/uploads/JMESTN42350250.pdf
17. Dodgson JE: Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. Journal of Human Lactation 2019, 35(2):220-222. doi: 10.1177/0890334419830990
18. Tobin GA, Begley CM: Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of advanced nursing 2004, 48(4):388-396. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x
19. Guba EG, Lincoln YS: Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research 1994, 2(163-194):105. URL: https://miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/1994_Guba_Lincoln_Paradigms_Quali_Research_chapter.pdf
20. McKinley CE, Figley CR, Woodward SM, Liddell JL, Billiot S, Comby N, Sanders S: Community-Engaged and Culturally Relevant Research to Develop Behavioral Health Interventions with American Indians and Alaska Natives. American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) 2019, 26(3):79-103. doi: 10.5820/aian.2603.2019.79
21. Hammersley M: Ethics of Ethnography. In: Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. edn. Edited by Iphofen R. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019: 1-13. URL: https://philpapers.org/rec/IPHHOR
Files
IssueVol 11 No 1 (2024): Winter QRcode
SectionPerspective Piece(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v11i1.14937
Keywords
Carspecken; critical ethnography; health disparity; intensive care units; nursing research
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Yarahmadi S, Soleimani M, Gholami M, Fakhr-Movahedi A, Saeidi Madani SM. Applying Carspecken’s critical ethnography method to uncover the culture of health disparity in intensive care units. NPT. 2024;11(1):5-15.