Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the confusion assessment method for intensive care units

  • Mohammad Arbabi Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mitra Zolfaghari Department of E-Learning in Medical Sciences, Virtual School, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Anahita Amirsardari Eye Research Center, Rassoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Noushin Fahimfar Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Sana Eybpoosh Mail Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Centre for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
Keywords:
delirium, intensive care units, confusion, CAM-ICU, Iran

Abstract

Background & Aim: Delirium is prevalent in the intensive care unit (ICU), especially among mechanically-ventilated patients. Delirium is associated with a significant increase in adverse outcomes but it usually remains undiagnosed, making it necessary to develop and validate diagnostic tools. This study determined the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units) CAM_ICU( in Iran.

Methods Materials: This cross-sectional study was conducted in open-heart ICU of three university hospitals of Tehran, Iran. After piloting the translated CAM-ICU on 10 patients and refining the translated scale accordingly, 40 ventilated patients were consecutively selected and screened for delirium by two independent evaluators (applying CAM-ICU), and one psychiatrist (using DSM-IV criteria for diagnosis). Inter-rater reliability between the two evaluators was assessed by the Kappa coefficient. Validity indices (i.e., sensitivity and specificity) of the Persian-CAM-ICU and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, given the psychiatrists’ diagnosis as the reference standard. Data were analyzed in Stata software (v. 11).

Results: Of 40 selected patients, CAM_ICU detected delirium in 30%. The Persian-CAM-ICU had a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 96%, and a positive and negative predictive value of 92% and 85%, respectively. Youden’s J statistic of the scale was 71%. Each of the four domains of the CAM-ICU showed a sensitivity and specificity of more than 69% and 90%, respectively, suggesting acceptable construct validity. There was good agreement between the two evaluators in terms of delirium diagnosis with the Persian-CAM-ICU (kappa coefficient = 0.74, P<0.0001).

Conclusion: The Persian version of the CAM_ICU is an effective, valid and reliable diagnostic tool in critically ill ICU patients. Application of the scale is recommended for the prompt diagnosis and prevent potential delirium in ventilated patients.

References

Milbrandt EB, a.E.E., Textbook of critical care. 5th ed ed. Agitation and delirium. 2005, Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunder.

Pauley, E., et al., Delirium is a robust predictor of morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients treated in the cardiac intensive care unit. American heart journal, 2015. 170(1): p. 79-86. e1.

Ely, E.W., et al., Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Jama, 2004. 291(14): p. 1753-1762.

Ely, E.W., et al., Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). Jama, 2001. 286(21): p. 2703-2710.

van Eck, v.d.S.J., et al., [Delirium on intensive care frequently missed: clinical impression alone is not enough]. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2009. 154: p. A1290-A1290.

Guenther, U., et al., Validity and reliability of the CAM-ICU Flowsheet to diagnose delirium in surgical ICU patients. Journal of critical care, 2010. 25(1): p. 144-151.

KJaH., J., in Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. Principles of critical care medicine. . 2005, McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub: New York.

Tobar, E., et al., Confusion Assessment Method for diagnosing delirium in ICU patients (CAM-ICU): cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version. Medicina intensiva/Sociedad Espanola de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias, 2009. 34(1): p. 4-13.

Mitasova, A., et al., Poststroke delirium incidence and outcomes: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Critical care medicine, 2012. 40(2): p. 484-490.

van Eijk, M.M., et al., Routine use of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit: a multicenter study. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2011. 184(3): p. 340-344.

Larsson, C., A.G. Axell, and A. Ersson, Confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM‐ICU): translation, retranslation and validation into Swedish intensive care settings. Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica, 2007. 51(7): p. 888-892.

Selim, A., et al., The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU): A prospective cohort study. International journal of nursing studies, 2018. 80: p. 83-89.

Pipanmekaporn, T., et al., Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Clinical interventions in aging, 2014. 9: p. 879.

Nishimura, K., et al., Sensitivity and specificity of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for detecting post-cardiac surgery delirium: a single-center study in Japan. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 2016. 45(1): p. 15-20.

Gusmao-Flores, D., et al., The validity and reliability of the Portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients. Clinics, 2011. 66(11): p. 1917-1922.

Akinci, S., et al., Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of confusion assesment method for the intensive care unit (CAM‐ICU): A‐640. European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 2005. 22: p. 167.

Ely, E.W., et al., Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Critical care medicine, 2001. 29(7): p. 1370-1379.

McNicoll, L., et al., Detection of delirium in the intensive care unit: comparison of confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit with confusion assessment method ratings. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2005. 53(3): p. 495-500.

Wild, D., et al., Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in health, 2005. 8(2): p. 94-104.

McPherson, J.A., et al., Delirium in the cardiovascular intensive care unit: exploring modifiable risk factors. Critical care medicine, 2013. 41(2): p. 405.

Chang, Y.-L., et al., Prevalence and risk factors for postoperative delirium in a cardiovascular intensive care unit. American journal of critical care, 2008. 17(6): p. 567-575.

Pandharipande, P., et al., Prevalence and risk factors for development of delirium in surgical and trauma ICU patients. The Journal of trauma, 2008. 65(1): p. 34.

Lat, I., et al., The impact of delirium on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated surgical and trauma patients. Critical care medicine, 2009. 37(6): p. 1898-1905.

Spronk, P.E., et al., Occurrence of delirium is severely underestimated in the ICU during daily care. Intensive care medicine, 2009. 35(7): p. 1276-1280.

Inouye, S.K., et al., Clarifying confusion: The confusion assessment methoda new method for detection of delirium. Annals of internal medicine, 1990. 113(12): p. 941-948.

Strøm, T., T. Martinussen, and P. Toft, A protocol of no sedation for critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomised trial. Lancet (London, England), 2010. 375(9713): p. 475.

Beat, J., et al., Scientific Writing-Easy when you know how. 2002: The BMJ Publishing Group.

Grover, S. and N. Kate, Assessment scales for delirium: A review. World journal of psychiatry, 2012. 2(4): p. 58.

Inouye, S.K., et al., Nurses' recognition of delirium and its symptoms: comparison of nurse and researcher ratings. Archives of internal medicine, 2001. 161(20): p. 2467-2473.

Rolfson, D.B., et al., Validity of the confusion assessment method in detecting postoperative delirium in the elderly. International Psychogeriatrics, 1999. 11(4): p. 431-438.

Published
2019-07-01
How to Cite
1.
Arbabi M, Zolfaghari M, Amirsardari A, Fahimfar N, Eybpoosh S. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the confusion assessment method for intensive care units. NPT. 6(3):123-132.
Section
Original Article(s)