Determining the non-pharmacological methods using to cope with radiation-related oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer

  • İsmail Toygar Department of Internal Medicine Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
  • Oznur Usta Yeşilbalkan Mail Department of Internal Medicine Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
Keywords:
head, neck neoplasms, oral mucositis, non-pharmacological methods

Abstract

Background & Aim: The radiation-related oral mucositis is common in patients with head and neck cancer. Patients trying pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods to cope with oral mucositis. In this study, it was aimed to determine the non-pharmacological methods in dealing with oral mucositis of head and neck cancer patients.

Methods & Materials: In this descriptive study, the data were collected from a University Hospital's radiotherapy unit and a special cancer treatment center between June 2017 and October 2018.  The study included 108 individuals aged 18 and over, who were diagnosed with head and neck cancer, could be communicated verbally and accepted to take part in the study during the study period. A convenience sample of patients was obtained from among all patients meeting the criteria for inclusion. A 20-item questionnaire (including the sociodemographic items, risk factors, oral mucositis history, and non-pharmacological methods) form developed by researchers were used in the study. The written permissions were obtained from the Ethics Committee of Ege University, Faculty of Nursing, the centers that research conducted and the participants. IBM Statistical Package for Social Science for Windows package program version 25.0 was used for analyzing the data.

Results: Of the 108 individuals included in the study, 64.8% (n=70) were male. The mean age of the participants was 59.73±8.92. It was found that 58.3% (n=63) of the participants had mouth problems after starting treatment. 69.8% of the individuals who developed oral mucositis used a non-pharmacological method to cope with oral mucositis. The most commonly used non-pharmacological method was the mixture of carbonate and salt with 60.7%. The second most common method was black mulberry syrup with 37.7%. Other methods were including propolis, mulberry syrup, raspberry syrup, tea tree oil, thyme, and sumac.

Conclusion: While some methods used by the patients were effective, the others were ineffective. Health professionals, especially nurses, requirement be informed about the non-pharmacological methods, therefore, they can guide the patients about using the right methods.

References

1. TUIK Ölüm Nedeni İstatistikleri. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Bülteni, Sayı:18855, Tarih: 30 Mart 2015, Access Date: 23.01.2019, Access: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=18855 .
2. Yildiz I, Ozguroglu M, Toptas T, Turna H, Sen F, Yildiz M. Patterns of complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish cancer patients. Journal of palliative medicine, 2013;16(4):383-390.
3. Turkish Ministry of Health, Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2013. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No: 956, Access Date: 23.01.2019, Access: http://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR/dosya/1-97020/h/saglik-istatistik-yilligi-2013.pdf .
4. A Snapshot of Head and Neck Cancer, National Cancer Institue, Access Date: 23.01.2019, Access: http://www.cancer.gov/research/progress/snapshots/head-and-neck .
5. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2018. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018;Jan;68(1):7-30.
6. Hickok JT, Morrow GR, Roscoe JA, Mustian K, Okunieff P. Occurrence, severity, and longitudinal course of twelve common symptoms in 1129 consecutive patients during radiotherapy for cancer. Journal of Pain Symptom Management. 2005;30(5):433–442.
7. Rosenthal, David I, Andrea Trotti. Strategies for managing radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer. Seminars in radiation oncology. 2009; 19(1):29-34.
8. Satheesh Kumar PS, Balan A, Sankar A, Bose T. Radiation induced oral mucositis. Indian journal of palliative care. 2009;15(2):95-102.
9. Hogan R. Implementation of an oral care protocol and its effects on oral mucositis. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing. 2009;26(3):125-135.
10. Dodd MJ, Miaskowski C, Shiba GH, Dibble SL, Greenspan D, Macphail L, et al. Risk factors for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: dental appliances, oral hygiene, previous oral lesions, and history of smoking. Cancer investigation. 1999;17(4):278-284.
11. Vera‐Llonch M, Oster G, Hagiwara M, Sonis S. Oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiation treatment for head and neck carcinoma: risk factors and clinical consequences. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society. 2006;106(2):329-336.
12. McGuire DB, Correa MEP, Johnson J, Wienandts P. The role of basic oral care and good clinical practice principles in the management of oral mucositis. Supportive care in cancer. 2006;14(6):541-547.
13. Demir Doğan M, Can G, Meral R. Effectiveness of Black Mulberry Molasses in Prevention of Radiotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis: A Randomized Controlled Study in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2017;23(12):971-979.
14. Worthington HV, Clarkson JE, Bryan G, Furness S, Glenny AM, Littlewood A, et al. Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2011;(4):CD000978.
15. Abdulrhman M, Samir Elbarbary N, Ahmed Amin D, Saeid Ebrahim R. Honey and a mixture of honey, beeswax, and olive oil–propolis extract in treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: a randomized controlled pilot study. Pediatric hematology and oncology. 2012;29(3):285-292.
16. Cox SD, Mann CM, Markham JL, Bell HC, Gustafson JE, Warmington JR, et al. The mode of antimicrobial action of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil). Journal of applied microbiology. 2000;88(1):170-175.
17. Del Bo C, Martini D, Porrini M, Klimis-Zacas D, Riso P. Berries and oxidative stress markers: an overview of human intervention studies. Food & function. 2015;6(9):2890-2917.
18. Durgo K, Belščak-Cvitanović A, Stančić A, Franekić J, Komes D. The bioactive potential of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) leaves in exhibiting cytotoxic and cytoprotective activity on human laryngeal carcinoma and colon adenocarcinoma. Journal of medicinal food. 2012;15(3):258-268.
19. Kang MH, Kawai Y, Naito M, Osawa T. Dietary defatted sesame flour decreases susceptibility to oxidative stress in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. The Journal of nutrition. 1999;129(10):1885-1890.
20. Kim HJ, Chen F, Wu C, Wang X, Chung HY, Jin Z. Evaluation of antioxidant activity of Australian tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil and its components. Journal of Agricultural and Food chemistry. 2004;52(10):2849-2854.
21. Nabavi SM, Marchese A, Izadi M, Curti V, Daglia M, Nabavi SF. Plants belonging to the genus Thymus as antibacterial agents: From farm to pharmacy. Food chemistry. 2015;173:339-347.
Published
2019-07-01
How to Cite
1.
Toygar İsmail, Yeşilbalkan OU. Determining the non-pharmacological methods using to cope with radiation-related oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer. NPT. 6(3):116-122.
Section
Original Article(s)