Original Article

Practice environment and work-related quality of life among nurses in a selected hospital in Zamboanga, Philippines: A correlational study

Abstract

Background & Aim: Nurses often work in problematic work environments, characterized by various difficulties and stress-factors that can undermine nurses’ full capacity to provide excellent care. In addition, the nurse practice environment can have an impact on the quality of work life, nurse recruitment and retention and quality patient outcomes. Thus, the study assessed the relationship between practice environment and work-related quality of life as perceived by nurses in a selected hospital in Zamboanga City, Philippines.
Methods & Materials: A descriptive correlational design was used in the study and the total population of nurses were recruited as participants.  The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index and Work-Related Quality of Life Scale were used to gather the needed data. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation and spearman rank-order correlation.
Results: A total of 103 nurses were surveyed in the study. In the perceived practice environment scale, it was revealed that the nursing foundation for quality of care was the highest (M=3.01, SD=0.20) and staffing and resource adequacy was the lowest (M=2.56, SD=0.45). On the other hand, job career satisfaction was the highest (M=3.64, SD=0.57) and stress at work was the lowest (M=2.55, SD=0.22) in the perceived work-related quality of life scale. The study showed a significant relationship between the perceived practice environment and perceived the work-related quality of life (rho=0.287, p=0.003).
Conclusion: The study revealed that nurses have a favorable work related quality of life and practice environment. However, formulating and enhancing programs for nurses such as incentive and professional development should be done as this can help foster and sustain a positive practice environment and job satisfaction.

1. Lake ET. Development of the practice environment scale of the Nursing Work Index. Research in nursing & health. 2002 Jun;25(3):176-88.
2. Leiter MP, Maslach C. Nurse turnover: the mediating role of burnout. Journal of nursing management. 2009 Apr;17(3):331-9.
3. Schubert M, Clarke SP, Glass TR, Schaffert-Witvliet B, De Geest S. Identifying thresholds for relationships between impacts of rationing of nursing care and nurse-and patient-reported outcomes in Swiss hospitals: a correlational study. International journal of nursing studies. 2009 Jul 1;46(7):884-93.
4. Kowalski C, Ommen O, Driller E, Ernstmann N, Wirtz MA, Köhler T, Pfaff H. Burnout in nurses–the relationship between social capital in hospitals and emotional exhaustion. Journal of Clinical nursing. 2010 Jun;19(11‐12):1654-63.
5. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Lake ET, Cheney T. Effects of hospital care environment on patient mortality and nurse outcomes. The Journal of nursing administration. 2008 May;38(5):223.
6. Hayes LJ, O’Brien-Pallas L, Duffield C, Shamian J, Buchan J, Hughes F, Laschinger HK, North N, Stone PW. Nurse turnover: a literature review. International journal of nursing studies. 2006 Feb 1;43(2):237-63.
7. American Nurses Association. Statement of the American Nurses Association for the Institute of Medicine’s Committee on Work Environment for Nurses and Patient Safety (Internet). Washington, DC: ANA; 2002 (cited 2019 Mar 18). Available from: www.nursingworld.org/FunctionalMenuCategories/MediaResources/PressReleases/2006_1/ANAonWorkEnvironment.aspx.
8. Walton RE. Quality of Work Life, What Is It? Sloan Manage Rev J. 1973:11–21.
9. Emadzadeh MK, Khorasani M, Nematizadeh F. Assessing the quality of work life of primary school teachers in Isfahan City. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business. 2012;3(9):438-48.
10. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1980
11. Lawler EE. Strategies for improving the quality of work life. Am Psychol. 1982; 37(5):486-93.
12. Van Laar D, Edwards JA, Easton S. The Work‐Related Quality of Life scale for healthcare workers. Journal of advanced nursing. 2007 Nov;60(3):325-33.
13. Griscti O, Jacono J. Effectiveness of continuing education programmes in nursing: literature review. Journal of Advanced nursing. 2006 Aug;55(4):449-56.
14. Friese CR, Lake ET, Aiken LH, Silber JH, Sochalski J. Hospital nurse practice environments and outcomes for surgical oncology patients. Health services research. 2008 Aug;43(4):1145-63.
15. Cho E, Chin DL, Kim S, Hong O. The relationships of nurse staffing level and work environment with patient adverse events. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2016 Jan;48(1):74-82.
16. Unruh L. Licensed nurse staffing and adverse events in hospitals. Medical care. 2003 Jan 1:142-52.
17. Al‐Kandari F, Thomas D. Perceived adverse patient outcomes correlated to nurses’ workload in medical and surgical wards of selected hospitals in Kuwait. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009 Feb;18(4):581-90.
18. Liang YW, Tsay SF, Chen WY. Effects of nurse staffing ratios on patient mortality in Taiwan acute care hospitals: a longitudinal study. Journal of Nursing Research. 2012 Mar 1;20(1):1-8.
19. Kramer M, Schmalenberg C. Staff nurses identify essentials of magnetism. Magnet hospitals revisited: Attraction and retention of professional nurses. 2002:25-59.
20. McVicar A. Workplace stress in nursing: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing. 2003 Dec;44(6):633-42.
21. Buchan J, Sochalski J. The migration of nurses: trends and policies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2004;82:587-94.
Files
IssueVol 6 No 4 (2019): Autumn QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v6i4.1944
Keywords
health facility environment nurses quality of life

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Barandino JP, Soriano G. Practice environment and work-related quality of life among nurses in a selected hospital in Zamboanga, Philippines: A correlational study. NPT. 2019;6(4):223-228.